Rosenblumtv

Entries from October 2007

The Beat Goes On

October 31, 2007 · 1 Comment

handsetpa_228x423.jpg
hello?

The irrepressible power of new technologies both to create and to destroy reaches into every niche. No one is immune.

The phone companies were once the most secure industries and the safest investment you could make.  ATT or earlier Bell Telephone were giants.  And, like cable or over-the-air broadcasting they had a technological monopoly on ‘getting into people’s homes’.  But instead of appending commercial spots to your phone calls, they just charged for the service.

It was  a model that worked.

It worked so well, and for so long in fact, that when radio came into vogue in the early ’20s, Bell Telephone opened (and shortly closed) its first radio station in NY.  It was called ‘toll radio’, and ‘users’ (ie, broadcasters) paid on a per-minute basis to ‘use’ Bell’s radio transmission studios and frequency to broadcast any message they wanted.  Bell took the business model for telephony and simply applied it to radio.

Bell and ATT were children of technology - a linear, point to point technology.  But like any revolution, technologies often eat their own children. And now it is the turn of the phone companies to be ‘eaten’.

The Daily Mail, a UK tabloid I read every morning online more for their stories of what happened to Madeline McCann then for tech news, is carrying a story about a new phone about to be offered in Britain this week.

Britain is rarely, if ever on the cutting edge of technology (at least not since James Watt and the steam engine), so when it appears in The Daily Mail, it is really in the mainstream.

The phone is being offered by a partnership between Network3, a UK company, and Skype.

For those of us who have been using Skype (or Vonage for that matter) for some time, the idea of VOIP is hardly new.  I have not had a landline for several years, and don’t ever see getting one again.  Almost all my calls now go over the web, and my phone bills have dropped to next to nothing.  But we are all ‘early adapters’.  Now it goes mainstream, and it goes straight to the heart of the phone company’s prime source of income - just as Craigslist went at the heart of newspaper’s revenue.

When your average ‘punter’ (UK term) starts making all their calls for free over the web, BT (British Telecom) can start thinking about turning their massive tower in central London into condos.

Releasing new technologies is a bit like opening Pandora’s Box - once opened, you never know what is going to leap out.

Categories: Barriers to Entry · Internet · The Daily Mail · skype · telephones

Play Ball!

October 30, 2007 · No Comments

1098940260_8329.jpg
Catch us….. on Nike.com!!!

The lifeblood of television is money.

Specifically, advertising money.

Take away the advertising money, and everything else ….. the conversations about quality, crew, anchor, content, all become pointless.

So, as Deep Throat once said - let’s follow the money.

Since their inception, networks (and local TV stations and cable for that matter) have been able to charge advertisers for time on their platforms because they could take the advertiser’s message into people’s homes and put it in front of any given or projected number of eyeballs.

When television was broadcast over the air, the pure physics of transmission and the limits of jamming so much analog information into the electromagnetic spectrum meant that there was a physical limitation to the number of networks (or local stations) that could exist.  Those fortunate enough to get licenses from the FCC (for free, no less), became fabulously wealthy - the Paleys, the Sarnoffs….  What would any advertiser pay to get their message into 30 million homes? (what would they not pay?) Networks were machines to print money - an effective technological monopoly (or triopoly, more properly). But there was plenty to go around.

When cable reared its technological head in the 1980s, like expansion baseball teams, it spread the wealth. Old habits die hard, so  the nets moved to cable (anyone out there got any rabbit ears?), and grudgingly gave up some of their households to new billionaires like Turner or Hendricks (Discovery) or as of last week Laybourne (Oxygen) - or moved into the territory themselves (MSNBC, A&E).  There was still plenty to go round.  The triopoly became something of a centopoly. But, (and this is important), the feeding model - that is, advertisers paying for a 30-second slice of air time, remained the same.

Now, (still with me?) - all of this takes us to the World Series.

(I knew that the photo above would take Mr. Safran, from Boston, down this far).

Here is the money model - Fox pays a lot for the rights to the World Series, but rates high and charges advertisers a lot for 30-second slots of airtime.

The World Series rates high because it is a content specific monopoly - you can’t see it anywhere else. So ad rates go for close to $500k per spot.

How does video on the web impact on this?

Online video removes the technological monopoly - or centopoly. Now anyone can stream tv into 3 billion homes - for free.

I just joined Mogulus, which allows me, and anyone in the world, to create their own tv network online.

Now, Nike, which is not so dumb, wakes up one day and says, “why should we pay all this money to Fox to carry our commercials. No one is watching ‘Fox’, what they are watching is The World Series.  “Why don’t we buy the rights to The World Series and broadcast it ourselves?  Who needs Fox?

This does make sense.

So Nike buys the rights to the 2008 World Series, and now, if you want to see it, the only place you can see it… is on Nike.com.

(Which, by the way, is now festooned with click and buy for Nike products).

Make sense?

Not to Fox…. but definitely to Nike.

If you want to understand who will win the game - first find out who owns the stick and ball.

Categories: Advertising · Barriers to Entry · Boston Red Sox · Mogulus · Technology · Television · World Series

Breakfast With Tiffany’s (dad)

October 29, 2007 · 3 Comments

1023_shlain.jpg
Dr. Leonard Shlain - Surgeon, Author, Raconteur.

Yesterday I got an interesting response, reprinted below, from Stephen Press, a cameraman who lives New Zealand. (more…)

Categories: Len Shlain · Tiffany Shlain · Tribes · iTunes

The World Turned Upside Down

October 27, 2007 · 2 Comments

goldsmith.jpg

Van Eyck - The Goldsmith’s Guild

In 1781, as the British fleet withdrew from the newly freed American colonies, the band on board Lord Cornwallis’ flagship played an English song entitled “The World Turned Upside Down”.

It was the end of an era. (more…)

Categories: Milton Friedman · b-roll.net

KGTV and the Fires

October 27, 2007 · 2 Comments

This just in (or lifted from) Lostremote.com

 

(more…)

Categories: Rosenblum

A Blast from the Past

October 26, 2007 · No Comments

dscf0386.jpg

PS 5 School - class of 1966

A few months ago, Jeff Jarvis told me I had to get on Facebook. (more…)

Categories: Facebook

Internetski

October 25, 2007 · No Comments

mccarthy.jpg

“close down that web!”

Is the Internet communist? (more…)

Categories: Communism · Internet

The “Talent” Trap

October 24, 2007 · 25 Comments

anchorman_.jpg

What’s it worth?

The notion of ‘on air talent’ represents an interesting dilema for local and network news, particularly as video heads for the non-linear web. (more…)

Categories: CBS News · New York Times · Rosenblum · TV News · Television

News Out of Spokane

October 23, 2007 · 5 Comments

fsc_mulvany_000.jpg

He made the leap…

The transition from crews to VJs is going slowly at TV stations, but it is on fire in the newspaper world. (more…)

Categories: Colin Mulvany · Rosenblum · Seattle · VJ · VideoJournalists

The Theory of Relativity

October 21, 2007 · 2 Comments

300px-eschers_relativity.jpg

What is ‘truth’ in journalism? (more…)

Categories: Journalism